LoL Internet
Welcome to LoL Internet
LoL Internet Welcome to LoL Internet
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Home | Forum | Arcade

Go to
LoL Internet Forum Index -> First Person Shooters

Counter-Strike 1.6 vs. Counter-Strike Source

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which is better?
Counter-Strike 1.6
50%
 50%  [ 3 ]
Counter-Strike Source
50%
 50%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 6

Author Message
Trivolver
Regular



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:15 am    Post subject: Counter-Strike 1.6 vs. Counter-Strike Source Reply with quote
Which do you find better, and why?

Personally, I like 1.6 better for overall style of gameplay. It takes more skill than source, in a way, and it's harder to control.. and that's why I like it =D Graphics may not be top of the line, but they're passable.. and it's easier to run, and steam isn't as gay for the half life engine than it is for the source engine.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
lowbart
Regular



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 33
Location: Jersey

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I have never actually played 1.6

I just vote Source just to piss you off, Moo.
_________________
Warning: The author of this post chronically suffers from Garden State Syndrome, a psychological disease caused by boredom and air pollution. The main symptoms of GSS are laziness and irritability. Please do not take any comments personally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
donotbeafoolman
Ass Goblin



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Hell on earth

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:45 pm    Post subject: hey... Reply with quote
Source of course better graphics are always a plus in game play, but I really wouldn't know if the controklls are harder than the original 1.6... Would you please define why is it that it is harder to control if you are able to change the configuration of your movement, sensitivity, or even the gameplay...

Also 1.6 and source to me it's only a small difference overall. So if I could have steam to constinly upgrade 1.6 then i wouldn't even bother to buy another version of C.S.

P.S.:
Steam is not bad, it's better to have steam included for C.S. than just C.S. alone. Plus it's a free downloaded program with news and free demos & upgrade available.
_________________
Blaze n' Glory
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Trivolver
Regular



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
By harder, I mean in terms of gun recoil, mostly. Even when pulling down the mouse, it's a lot crazier than source. It's what makes it fun.

And steam is only bad when you run it for source engine - it kinda doesn't download maps and stuff correctly, or tell you that it is.. and it takes up some bit of ram.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Serbian Tostitos Chips
Hebrew First Class



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 40

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Personally, I must vote for Source. I find it much more enjoyable then 1.6, don't ask me why because I don't really care.
_________________
Thou shalt bow before thee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
donotbeafoolman
Ass Goblin



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Hell on earth

PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:55 pm    Post subject: About Source Reply with quote
Source of course have a very good graphics, and I mean animations of guns would just blow gamers like me away. I would certainly enjoy source, but see becuase of it's price and it's just an additional add-on, less people would prefere to play on it then they would on CS 1.6. About the gun recoil and stuff, i personally think that smal details like that wouldn't really matter the game play If you really are a good game player. Not that I am saying I am a Great game player, but I think that it's better if players would stick to the free updating of 1.6.
_________________
Blaze n' Glory
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Zero
Ass Goblin



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 11
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sat May 13, 2006 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Dumbest, Topic, Ever.

1.6 Clearly surpasses Source in all ways except for graphics. Though, like you said, The graphics are passable. I still hold rank#1 on my favorite source server, I normally use AWP/Scout / Deagle. Thats just, sad, mostly its a scout. 1.6 IS way harder, more skill, and just overall funner.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
b0bzilla
Ass Pirate



Joined: 04 Jun 2006
Posts: 25
Location: my box of a home

PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
css>1.6
nuff said
_________________
boobiez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    LoL Internet Forum Index -> First Person Shooters All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Template/Skin (ChunkStyle) by ©Russellc (TheChunk.no-ip.com)
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox 0.8
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Effex-Media Web Resources


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free